Daaz99 wrote:It's not science. How can you say something is exactly twice as good?
As for awarding six or seven stars, what if you see a film worth three stars then see a film exactly twice as good (or more)? Don't buy this "twice as good"?
Daaz99 wrote:It's not science. You either rated the first film wrong or the better film is a better five star film. Ratings are a quantitative guide to the goodness of a film and thus inherently omit qualitative information.
What if you see a film worth five stars then see a film much better (by "better" meaning more than the difference between four star films and five star films)?
